Seventh Circuit: Merely Discouraging FMLA Leave May Constitute FMLA Interference

Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a significant decision clarifying the scope of the Family & Medical Leave Act’s (“FMLA”) provision prohibiting employers from interfering with an employee’s exercise of his or her rights under the FMLA. 

In Ziccarelli v. Dart, No. 19-3435, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 15032, (7th Cir. June 1, 2022), a Seventh Circuit panel unanimously concluded that merely discouraging an employee from taking FMLA leave may constitute FMLA interference, and expressly rejected prior decisions implying that an employer’s actual denial of an FMLA request is an essential or requisite element to an FMLA interference claim.  See Opinion, Ziccarelli v. Dart – Link 

In reaching its conclusion, the Seventh Circuit employed an expansive interpretation of the FMLA’s interference provision to encompass a broader range of activities and conduct giving rise to employer liability and exposure.

To avoid or limit exposure or liability, employers subject to the FMLA’s requirements should strictly adhere to the FMLA’s requirements and procedures, and exercise extensive care, attention and caution in communicating with employees regarding matters related to FMLA or other protected leave.

For any questions regarding the potential impact of the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Ziccarelli v. Dart, the FMLA, or other employment law matters, please contact at attorney at SFBBG by calling (312) 648-2300.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Articles

Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Reporting Requirement Stayed

Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Reporting Requirement Stayed

Yesterday, we reported that the motions panel of the Federal Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit decided, pending appeal, that reporting companies are required to file their beneficial ownership information with FinCEN no later than January 13, 2025. However, late yesterday, the merits panel of the same Court ordered a portion of the motions panel decision to be vacated, effectively reinstating the District Court’s December 3, 2024 preliminary injunction staying the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its Reporting Rule.

Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Now in Effect, with Deadline Extensions

Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Now in Effect, with Deadline Extensions

Earlier this month, we reported that the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction staying the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its Reporting Rule. This week the Federal Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit decided that reporting companies are required to file their beneficial ownership information with FinCEN.

Rules and Lawsuits and Injunctions, Oh My!

Rules and Lawsuits and Injunctions, Oh My!

What is the practical effect of two recent FLSA rulings?

In recent months, two different courts sitting in Texas have issued headline-grabbing rulings interpreting the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).