SFBBG Scores Court Victory for Health Club

SFBBG notched a win for Bally Total Fitness Corporation when, following a trial last week in Milwaukee Circuit Court, the Court found Bally not liable for a retinal detachment injury suffered by a member during a Tae Kwon Do sparring class at a Bally health club. Bally was represented at trial by Firm partners Norman T. Finkel and William R. Klein, who have been representing health and fitness clubs for over 30 years.  The plaintiff, a health club member and top student in Tae Kwon Do with a first degree black belt, was kicked in the eye by a Tae Kwon Do instructor, a fifth degree black belt who was teaching the class.  During the sparring class, the member was wearing the full array of protective equipment required by Bally during sparring classes, including head gear and a mouth guard.

Circuit Judge Rebecca F. Dallet ruled the health club member assumed the risk of injury to the head area after previously participating in countless sparring sessions over a period of three years.  Under Wisconsin law, “a participant in a recreational activity … accepts the risk inherent in a recreational activity in which the ordinary prudent person is or should be aware.”  Judge Dallet found the weight of the evidence supported Bally’s arguments that the member had participated in numerous sparring classes where kicks to the head area were permitted and common, that making and defending such kicks are an integral part of Tae Kwon Do and practice sparring sessions, and that an ordinary person should have expected kicks to the head area by an instructor at a Bally sparring session.

A copy of the article that was published in the Chicago Law Bulletin can be seen here.

Related Articles

Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Reporting Requirement Stayed

Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Reporting Requirement Stayed

Yesterday, we reported that the motions panel of the Federal Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit decided, pending appeal, that reporting companies are required to file their beneficial ownership information with FinCEN no later than January 13, 2025. However, late yesterday, the merits panel of the same Court ordered a portion of the motions panel decision to be vacated, effectively reinstating the District Court’s December 3, 2024 preliminary injunction staying the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its Reporting Rule.

Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Now in Effect, with Deadline Extensions

Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements Now in Effect, with Deadline Extensions

Earlier this month, we reported that the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction staying the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its Reporting Rule. This week the Federal Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit decided that reporting companies are required to file their beneficial ownership information with FinCEN.

Rules and Lawsuits and Injunctions, Oh My!

Rules and Lawsuits and Injunctions, Oh My!

What is the practical effect of two recent FLSA rulings?

In recent months, two different courts sitting in Texas have issued headline-grabbing rulings interpreting the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).