Client Services
Our attorneys’ experience litigating defamation, libel, slander, privacy and First Amendment cases includes:
Representing an on-line news tabloid
Defending an on-line celebrity news tabloid regarding statements published about a reality TV show participant and obtaining an award of attorneys’ fees as a sanction following the dismissal of the lawsuit with prejudice.
Representing a professional athlete
Representing a professional athlete in trial, appellate, and state supreme courts against a radio “shock jock”, his on-air side-kick, and the station owner for false on-air statements, resulting in an optimal settlement shortly prior to trial
Defending a not-for-profit corporation
Defending multiple cases filed against a not-for-profit corporation for statements published in a book about Chicago street gangs, resulting in the dismissal of defamation per se and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims with prejudice.
Representing a content provider
Successful defense of client through jury verdict against a sattelite television content distributor’s $21 million defamation claim against a content provider.
Defending a local union officer
Defending a local union officer’s union election campaign speech critical of a political rival, resulting in the dismissal of the case with prejudice.
Representation of private citizens & businesses
Representation of private citizens and businesses in First Amendment challenges to municipal ordinances restricting commercial speech and political speech.
Defending a law firm
Defending a law firm in state trial and appellate courts regarding media statements that a U.S. Senator’s campaign treasurer was “fired for incompetence.” The case was dismissed with prejudice and the dismissal was affirmed on appeal.
Representing a prominent criminal defense attorney
Representing a prominent criminal defense attorney in trial, appellate and state supreme courts where a nationally distributed book published that he paid bribes to “fix” and “handle” criminal cases.
Obtaining a jury verdict
Obtaining a jury verdict for compensatory and punitive damages for a labor union president for false statements made during a union election campaign.
Obtaining a defense verdict
Obtaining a defense verdict in a jury trial regarding alleged statements that the plaintiff, a former government official, extorted kickbacks from local businesses.
Get Started
Choose your point of contact.
We have a few staff members who specialize in this service. To learn more about them, click their profiles below!
Our Practice Areas
Business
Our team will give efficient counsel for your business and the various things that affect businesses like employment, sales reps, intellectual property, etc.
Finance
SFBBG is leading the industry in providing excellent counsel for financial services such as banking & creditor rights, estate planning, probate, and trust.
Litigation
We zealously litigate, arbitrate and mediate. Nothing drives a favorable outcome more than readiness for a smooth and successful trial. We're here to help!
Real Estate
Our attorneys are trusted counsel and business advisors with a broad range of real estate expertise to serve the firm’s sophisticated clientele.
News & Updates
Increasing Tax Basis on a Decedent’s Death
Question: My mother is terminally ill and holds a meaningful amount of property, including traditional Individual Retirement Accounts. Is there a basis step-up at her death on her IRAs and on any of my appreciated assets I may choose to transfer to her?
COVID-19 Response Plan
To our valued clients, colleagues and friends: At Schoenberg Finkel Newman & Rosenberg, we take our obligation to ensure a healthy and safe working environment as seriously as our commitment to providing a continuous, high level of service to our clients. Since...
Schoenberg Finkel Beederman Bell Glazer LLC has been ranked in Illinois Chambers Spotlight 2025 Guide and recognized as a top small firm handling high-quality work.
SFBBG was selected based on an independent and in-depth market analysis, coupled with an assessment of our experience, expertise and caliber of talent.
Updates to Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Deadlines – Reporting Requirement Stayed
Yesterday, we reported that the motions panel of the Federal Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit decided, pending appeal, that reporting companies are required to file their beneficial ownership information with FinCEN no later than January 13, 2025. However, late yesterday, the merits panel of the same Court ordered a portion of the motions panel decision to be vacated, effectively reinstating the District Court’s December 3, 2024 preliminary injunction staying the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) and its Reporting Rule.